media
Do you still remember that is a term, so called media in Physics? In Physics, we learn that light travels with straight line, but the direction would change after it travel into different media, for example the light will bend when it travels from air to water. Then air and water are two different media with different density, therefore the light can't be a straight line anymore after that.
And now, we are talking about news, that is a media would spread the news, however they might not really spread the reality, because the media isn't the witness and they only can create whatever story they like through description from the witness and their own imagination, maybe they also create story according to their own will.
This morning, our management just sent a notification about the health announcement issue (about h1n1 in my yesterday blog), then I recieved a call from friend in KL advised me not to work in office because he said that is an intellier got infection of h1n1. I was stunned after hearing this, and told him that is her family member got infection but not her personally, she and her dungeon teammates are in quarentine now for safety purpose.
From here, we can tell how media works, people always spread the news (perhaps I can say it is romour) just with a piece from a puzzle, and create story according on their imagination, and transfer to another one, then that would be another story creation and this story creation procedure continue until we don't really get the original message.
Well, I really want to say, media is really dangerous post and they need to play their responsibility to make sure reliability of the story, else this would create lot of confusion and misunderstanding between information provider and the information reciever.
This remind me about Micheal Jackson, there were so many negative news about him before he died, but all the bad news just turns as romours and overwritten with his positive news after he past away. How can I trust media? They only a story maker to earn money on their "special" news but kept killing the truth, don't they know this would hurt the character in their story?
This is media, they never consider what is side effect on their story, but they only hope to gather all attention from their reader/reciever, everyone is creating their news by themselves.
Anyways, I think information reciever should be smart enough on recieving information, they need to judge carefully on relaibility of the message, we shouldn't follow blinkly on story from media.
And now, we are talking about news, that is a media would spread the news, however they might not really spread the reality, because the media isn't the witness and they only can create whatever story they like through description from the witness and their own imagination, maybe they also create story according to their own will.
This morning, our management just sent a notification about the health announcement issue (about h1n1 in my yesterday blog), then I recieved a call from friend in KL advised me not to work in office because he said that is an intellier got infection of h1n1. I was stunned after hearing this, and told him that is her family member got infection but not her personally, she and her dungeon teammates are in quarentine now for safety purpose.
From here, we can tell how media works, people always spread the news (perhaps I can say it is romour) just with a piece from a puzzle, and create story according on their imagination, and transfer to another one, then that would be another story creation and this story creation procedure continue until we don't really get the original message.
Well, I really want to say, media is really dangerous post and they need to play their responsibility to make sure reliability of the story, else this would create lot of confusion and misunderstanding between information provider and the information reciever.
This remind me about Micheal Jackson, there were so many negative news about him before he died, but all the bad news just turns as romours and overwritten with his positive news after he past away. How can I trust media? They only a story maker to earn money on their "special" news but kept killing the truth, don't they know this would hurt the character in their story?
This is media, they never consider what is side effect on their story, but they only hope to gather all attention from their reader/reciever, everyone is creating their news by themselves.
Anyways, I think information reciever should be smart enough on recieving information, they need to judge carefully on relaibility of the message, we shouldn't follow blinkly on story from media.
Comments